Repositioning universities for a lifelong skills economy
This blog was kindly authored by Peter Moss, Business Development Director, Ellucian.
The UK’s higher education sector stands at a defining crossroads. For decades, universities have played a vital role in educating young people at the beginning of their careers. But today, economic pressure, demographic change, and rapid technological advancement are fundamentally reshaping what learners, employers, and society might need next.
There is a growing consensus that our future workforce will increasingly depend on lifelong learning. This is not a marginal adjustment, but a structural shift that requires universities to rethink their role, their operating models, and the infrastructure that underpins them.
I recently contributed to the white paper The Skills Shift: How UK Universities Can Reposition Themselves for Lifelong Learning, alongside vice chancellors, sector leaders, and transformation specialists, to explore how institutions can respond to this challenge and opportunity.
Why the skills shift matters now
Skills gaps in the UK economy are well-documented, particularly in areas such as digital, healthcare, engineering, and green technologies. The International Monetary Fund has highlighted in the report, Upskilling the UK Workforce, that the UK faces larger and more chronic skills shortages than many peer countries, with employers consistently reporting recruitment difficulties in high-skill roles. These gaps are not only slowing productivity but are also limiting long-term economic resilience.
At the same time, the nature of work itself is changing rapidly. Advances in AI and automation are compressing the ‘half-life’ of skills, meaning that knowledge becomes obsolete far more quickly than in previous decades. An IBM survey estimates that around 40% of the global workforce will need to reskill over the next three years due to the adoption of AI and automation alone. Lifelong learning is therefore not optional; it is becoming a core requirement of economic participation.
For universities, this creates a powerful tension. Traditional three-year degrees remain essential, but they will no longer be sufficient on their own to meet national skills needs or to ensure long-term institutional sustainability. Learners increasingly expect flexible, career-aligned education that fits around work, family, and other commitments, often returning to education multiple times over the course of their lives.
This is not a niche audience. According to UCAS, around one third of UK undergraduates are now mature students, a proportion that continues to rise, particularly in professionally aligned disciplines. The reality is that higher education is already serving a learner base far more diverse than the traditional ‘school leaver’ model assumes.
Universities are uniquely placed to respond. They already possess deep subject expertise, trusted brands, employer relationships, and robust quality assurance frameworks. The question is no longer whether universities can play a central role in lifelong learning but how they can adapt to do so effectively.
From one‑time education to lifelong engagement
One of the clearest themes emerging from the white paper is the need for institutions to move beyond a single point of engagement with learners. Instead of viewing students primarily as entrants aged 18 to 21, universities must build models that support people at 25, 35, 45 and beyond.
This has important implications for curriculum design. Modular learning, stackable credits, and shorter, skills-focused provision allow individuals to acquire what they need, when they need it – while still creating pathways to full qualifications over time. Done well, this approach benefits both learners and institutions, enabling universities to extend their reach and relevance across multiple life stages.
Just as importantly, lifelong learning strengthens the relationship between universities and employers. When education aligns more closely with labour market demand, institutions can co-create provision with industry partners, support regional economic growth, and help learners transition more smoothly between education and work.
Collaboration, not competition
Another key insight from the white paper is the growing importance of collaboration, not only with employers but across the education ecosystem itself. No single institution can meet every skills need alone. Partnerships with further education colleges, other universities, and sector bodies will be essential to delivering coherent, regional skills strategies.
This requires a mindset shift. While competition for students and funding remains a reality, collaboration creates opportunities to share investment, reduce duplication, and widen access to learning. In a system under sustained financial pressure, collective approaches may increasingly prove the most sustainable path forward.
Infrastructure as an enabler of change
However, none of this transformation can happen without the right foundations in place. Lifelong learning introduces complexity: flexible enrolment cycles, varied pricing models, intermittent study patterns, and learners who may move between institutions over time.
Legacy systems and fragmented processes make this difficult to manage at scale. To support a skills-based future, universities need integrated, standardised digital infrastructure that can adapt to change, support collaboration, and provide clear insight into learner journeys and outcomes. Technology alone is not the answer, but without it, even the most ambitious strategies will struggle to take hold.
A moment of opportunity
The shift towards lifelong learning is not a passing policy initiative. It reflects deeper changes in how people work, learn, and build careers in an AI-enabled economy. Universities that respond proactively have the opportunity to strengthen their societal contribution, deepen employer partnerships, and build more resilient, sustainable futures.
The white paper explores these issues in depth, drawing on real world experience from across the sector and offering practical considerations for leaders navigating this transition.
Read the full white paper, The Skills Shift: How UK Universities Can Reposition Themselves for Lifelong Learning, to explore the insights shaping the future of UK higher education. Ellucian is a HEPI partner.





Comments
Paul Wiltshire says:
“universities must build models that support people at 25, 35, 45 and beyond”.
Yet another example of the HE sector trying to look virtuous in that it is all about ‘helping’ individuals develop their lives and careers, whereas all this is really about is finding ways to increase it’s customer base and sell more of their products to society. So If the HE sector failed to get them to go to Uni aged 18, then they’ll keep giving it a go for the next three decades on the basis that every single person in society is potentially a customer and they are entitled to a student loan. The HE sector has been set up to have a commercial imperative, so it is little wonder that it will do all it can to convert everybody into a customer.
Reply
Add comment