The benefits and costs of international higher education students to the UK economy

Every 10 international students generate £1 million in net economic benefit for the UK, according to new research.

International students who began higher education courses in the UK in 2024/25 are expected to generate a net economic benefit of £40.4 billion for the UK over the course of their studies, according to a major new report published today by the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) and Kaplan International Pathways.

The report, The benefits and costs of international higher education students to the UK economy, produced by London Economics, finds that the 404,500 international students who started UK higher education courses in 2024/25 will generate total economic benefits of £45.1 billion over the course of their studies, while costing the public purse an estimated £4.7 billion, resulting in a benefit-to-cost ratio of 9.7 to 1.

The analysis estimates that the average net economic contribution is approximately £100,000 per international student, meaning every 10 international students creates around £1 million in net economic impact for the UK economy.

This report comes amid continuing debate over international student policy as more countries than ever are competing to attract international students.

In addition to the overall UK-level impacts, the results are broken down by parliamentary constituency – see the interactive dashboard with the constituency-level results below. A full table of constituency-level benefits and a map of regional economic benefits are also available in the attached report (pages 68 and 41).

For the first time, the analysis uses newly available detailed data on students’ term-time addresses, providing a more accurate picture of the local economic contribution made by international students across the UK. The findings show that these benefits are spread across all nations and regions of the UK.

The key findings of the report are:

  • The total net impact on the UK economy of the 2024/25 cohort of international student entrants (404,500 students) was estimated at £40.4bn across the duration of their studies.
  • The total benefit to the UK economy was approximately £45.1bn, while the total costs were £4.7bn. This implies a benefit-to-cost ratio of 9.7 to 1.
  • These benefits can also be expressed in terms of the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs supported. In total, the economic activity generated by international students in the 2024/25 cohort supported approximately 287,300 FTE jobs in the UK.
  • The net economic impact per student was estimated at £100,000 per international student. In other words, every 10 international students contribute £1m to the UK economy over the duration of their studies.
  • The net economic impact has increased by £4.1bn since 2021/22, from £36.3bn for the 2021/22 cohort to £40.4bn for the 2024/25 cohort (on a like-for-like basis and adjusted for inflation).
  • However, the number of international first-year students coming to the UK has declined by ca. 54,500 (12%) since 2022/23. If the 2022/23 student numbers had been sustained in 2024/25, the net impact would have been approximately £2.9bn higher. In other words, the effective economic loss from the recent drop in international students stands at £2.9bn (for the 2024/25 cohort alone).
  • The economic impact is spread across the UK. On average, international students make a £62m net contribution to the UK economy per parliamentary constituency. This is equivalent to £580 per member of the resident population.

Linda Cowan, Managing Director at Kaplan International Pathways, said:

In an increasingly competitive international market, which has seen the ‘Big Four’ study destinations (the US, the UK, Australia and Canada) expand into a broader group of more than a dozen leading global education destinations, a positive and welcoming environment is essential if the UK is to remain a leader. The UK is home to some of the world’s foremost universities, but we cannot rely on reputation alone. We must continue to demonstrate the value of a UK education and ensure international students feel welcomed from the moment they consider applying. If international education is to support the UK’s growth ambitions, government must also be part of the solution, providing a stable, competitive and welcoming policy environment that gives students confidence to choose the UK.

Rose Stephenson, Director of Policy and Strategy at HEPI, commented:

Immigration is a top concern for voters in Britain, and it is important that the debate around immigration policy is informed by evidence. This report shows that international students generate very substantial benefits for the UK economy and underpin the financial sustainability of many universities. If ministers decide to further reduce international student numbers, they should be clear that there will be economic costs as well as potential political benefits. At a time when the UK is seeking stronger economic growth, those trade-offs deserve an honest and open discussion.

Maike Halterbeck, Partner at London Economics, added:

This new report provides updated evidence on the substantial economic value that international students bring to the UK economy – value that is spread widely across the country. However, it also demonstrates what the economy stands to lose if and when this major export sector starts to decline. The number of international first-year students coming to the UK has already decreased by around 54,500 (12%) since 2022/23, and is expected to continue to decline as key new policy changes – including the potential new international student fee levy – come into force. 

Notes to editors

  1. Kaplan is a leading global provider of education and training with an 80-plus-year history offering university pathway programmes (Kaplan International Pathways), higher education, on-line and transnational education, test preparation, professional education and professional assessments. Kaplan works in partnership with universities in the UK, US, Ireland, Canada, Australia and New Zealand and with companies around the world. Kaplan is a subsidiary of Graham Holdings Company (NYSE: GHC) and its largest division.
  1. The Higher Education Policy Institute was founded in 2002 to influence the higher education debate with evidence. HEPI is UK-wide, independent and non-partisan. HEPI is funded by organisations and higher education institutions that wish to support vibrant policy discussions, as well as through events. HEPI is a company limited by guarantee and a registered charity.
  1. London Economics is one of the UK’s leading specialist economics and policy consultancies. With a dedicated division of professional economists specialised in education and labour markets, we have unparalleled experience across the higher education sector. As a result of our independence and the quality of the analysis we undertake, we are considered sector experts and often deliver economic insight to key policy makers and stakeholders. For more information, visit londoneconomics.co.uk.

Get our updates via email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Comments

  • Jonathan Alltimes says:

    The International Student Levy: the balance sheet. The report argues that the rationale for sustaining the numbers of international students are the net financial benefits for geographically-located economies. The net financial benefits for UK-domiciled students and their families is unknown. The method of double-entry bookkeeping for recording costs, revenue and profits or loss was an invention of a banking family, which is the basis of the bureacratic enterprise.

    Marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost. The revenue accruing from international students is only possible because of the sunk cost of decades worth of subsidies from the State and the universities themselves, itself built on hundreds of years of carefully stewarding endowments and investments for sustaining their existence as charities.

    There is no evidence that the higher education sector has enabled the State to respond to its rationales for expanding the sector, notably a route out poverty, improvements in productivity, and economic growth or any other party political rationale. The removal of the limit on student numbers introduced more domestic competition into the sector, but the evidence of causing benefits for UK-domiciled students is also lacking. Accruing revenue and profit from international students for geographically-located economies has never been a political and financial objective of the State. The reason the argument is being reiterated is because the previous administration refused to raise tuition fees and sought cuts. The current government can not raise tuition fees because its own 2003 policy and later 2004 Act for the expansion of student numbers assumed continued strong economic growth from which to extract taxes for subsidising the higher education sector.

    What must UK-domiciled students and even international students themselves think, when their educational experience is one where international students are in the majority? Do not worry about the competition for student accommodation.

    The balance sheet ignores certain things, that is how it works, such as what can not be counted in a culture and its heritage. What are the alternative options to sustaining the numbers of international students and the level for their tuition fees?

    Reply

    Your comment may be revised by the site if needed.

Add comment

Your comment may be revised by the site if needed.

More like this

Author
Anna Zimdars, Christopher Playford, Eve Worth, Luke Graham, Joanna Merrett and Joseph Crawford
Published
21 July 2026
Author
Dr Alice Beck and Dr Helen Thomas-Hughes
Published
18 July 2026