From access to graduate success: the next phase of social mobility
This blog was kindly authored by Professor Sir Nishan Canagarajah, President and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Leicester and Martin Edmondson, Chief Executive of the Graduate Futures Institute.
Access is not enough
Britain has made real progress in widening access to higher education. More people, from more backgrounds, now have the chance to benefit from university than in previous generations. But access to university is no longer the whole social mobility story.
Disadvantage can persist through higher education and into employment. The continuing challenge is to ensure graduates from every background can access meaningful work, build confidence and secure opportunity.
This challenge is at the heart of From Access to Graduate Success: The Next Phase of Social Mobility, a new report launched by the Graduate Futures Institute, in partnership with the University of Leicester.
The report draws on 288 professionals working across 107 UK higher education providers, alongside 47 institutional perspectives. Of survey respondents:
- 97 per cent agreed that students from under-represented groups face employment disadvantage compared with their peers;
- 96 per cent said work-related learning is essential or very important in reducing that disadvantage; and
- 69 per cent believed some under-represented groups are at greater risk of being left behind as AI tools reshape the labour market.
These findings do not point to a lack of talent or excess of graduates. They indicate unequal access to what helps people progress: professional networks, paid experience, recruitment knowledge, financial flexibility, confidence and careers support.
A shared jobs challenge
Universities UK’s Future Jobs Roadmap makes the economic case clearly: the future economy will need more graduates, and employers need stronger links with universities to access the skills required for growth.
But the transition into work is still uneven. Graduates are more likely than non-graduates to be in education or employment and tend to move into work more quickly, yet too many still face difficult starts, especially those from under-represented groups or weaker regional labour markets.
If Britain wants stronger growth, higher productivity and a fairer labour market, graduate opportunity must become a shared national priority. Universities can prepare students, but employers, local authorities and government can help turn that preparation into real opportunity.
Higher education’s public promise
Higher education matters for many reasons: intellectual growth, civic participation, cultural enrichment and economic benefit. But for students and families, the prospect of a better career is a central part of its public promise.
That does not reduce university to a single employment metric; it recognises that fair access to graduate careers is now an important test of whether higher education is delivering on social mobility.
We should be honest about what is at stake. Graduate opportunity affects who gets to build influence, enter the professions, lead institutions and shape society. Research by LSE in Born to Rule: the making and remaking of the British elite found that “there is less movement at the top than we think”, with those born into the top one per cent almost as likely to enter the elite today as they were 125 years ago.
If we want our institutions, professions and public life to better reflect the talent of the whole population, universities, government and employers must work together to remove the barriers that prevent capable graduates from progressing.
The recent creation of the Class Unit in the Office for Equality and Opportunity should sharpen the national focus on this agenda. It speaks directly to this report’s central challenge: talent is not lacking, but routes into good work are still too often shaped by networks, assumptions and uneven access to opportunity.
Putting this into practice
For universities, the response must be practical and strategic. Employability support should reach students who cannot easily access optional activities. Targeted guidance, mentoring and specialist provision should be protected where barriers are greatest, and work-related learning should be embedded in the curriculum.
At Leicester, we have been putting this into practice by designing opportunity directly into the student experience. Every student has access to at least 100 hours of work-related learning as part of their degree, ensuring they graduate with real-world experience, confidence and the skills employers value. Through our collaboration with Microsoft, which gives every student full and equitable access to Microsoft’s Copilot AI tools, and by embedding use of AI across our teaching and assessment, we are helping students develop the digital and AI capabilities that will increasingly shape graduate careers.
The sector already knows much about effective practice, yet financial pressure is reconfiguring provision. Many of the activities respondents value most, including one-to-one guidance, specialist roles and bursary-backed experience, are also among those being reduced. This risks compounding the challenges faced by students who most need support. Digital and AI-enabled services can extend reach, but they complement human support rather than substitute for it.
Universities cannot do this alone. Employers should create more paid, accessible entry routes, backed by inclusive recruitment, induction and progression. Government should make it easier and less risky for employers, particularly SMEs, to recruit new graduates in weaker regional labour markets. Local authorities and civic partners should help connect talent, transport, employers and place-based growth.
From participation to opportunity
Widening access to university has been one of the major social mobility achievements of recent decades. The next phase is to widen access to graduate success.
We must support every student to access the skills, confidence, networks and experiences needed to succeed after graduation. Anything less risks asking students to reach the door of opportunity, only to find that others still hold the key.





Comments
Jonathan Alltimes says:
What causes social mobility or graduate employment?
“The Social Mobility Commission broadly defines social mobility as the link between an individual’s occupation, income, or circumstances and those of their parents.”
(Source: ONS)
The report is a competition strategy for the employment of students. The report describes a set of qualitative concepts supposed to explain the social mobility or employment of nearly 10 million students (or whatever years) who have graduated with a bachelor’s degree since 1997 when the Dearing Report first proposed such ideas or any other later similar government milestones. The report does not explain how these concepts are selected, that is, the report does not follow a research methodology and these concepts are misaligned to a standard definition of social mobility. The first thing is to narrow the scope of the theory and the second thing is to understand the major cause explaining the social mobility or graduate employment of interest and its historical processes. The report does not explain the social mobility of graduates or their graduate employment. The use of three weeks worth of work experience is essentially the rudiments of employment enculturation and should already have been introduced during the degree and practiced to the extent that it has become an occupation-specific skill. Academics can include education which enables students to be better matched to a better occupation, but there are limits to what a degree can provide and general skills should have been learnt at school or the first year of an undergraduate degree. The professions are a model of education for employment, as these occupations require standardized skills, high standards of numeracy, independent judgement, and self-regulated behaviour.
Reply
David Biggs says:
One of the easiest, simplest and quickest actions we can take is to help students and recent graduates tell their story.
Many of the young people I meet from less socially mobile backgrounds have had more varied and more challenging life experiences. But they have had fewer opportunities to discuss, to reflect and to harness that experience into a compelling story.
I’m consistently seeing with HeadStart programme participants, that a simple framework and face to face practice, step-changes their career planning into real achievable actions and their self – confidence soars.
We just need help to ramp up the reach.
Reply
Add comment