Skip to content
The UK's only independent think tank devoted to higher education.

How do Admissions Professionals use the UCAS personal statement? 

  • 15 June 2023

A survey of 113 higher education admissions professionals from over 30 higher education providers shows the average time spent reading a UCAS personal statement is two minutes. Four-in-ten (39%) are read for one minute or less.

In How do Admissions Professionals use the UCAS personal statement? (HEPI Policy Note 48), Tom Fryer and Professor Steven Jones from the University of Manchester show that, when personal statements are read, they are mainly used to assess applicants’ interest in a course (88%). Other uses include: gaining contextual information (65%), assessing academic potential (40%) and assessing work experience (29%).

The majority of admissions professionals say decisions about which applicants should be offered a place are primarily made on the basis of grades.

Only 51% of respondents agree that the UCAS personal statement impacts significantly on admissions decisions. 

There is considerable variation between different disciplines. The UCAS personal statement is more likely to be considered important for admissions decisions in vocational or highly selective courses.

The results have implications for UCAS’s proposal to reform the personal statement to a series of short questions covering six themes (motivation; preparedness for course; preparedness through other experiences; extenuating circumstances; preparedness for study; and learning styles). 

The survey provides little evidence that ‘preparedness for study’ and ‘preferred learning styles’ are relevant to admissions decisions. There is also little evidence to support the division of ‘preparedness for the course’ and ‘preparedness through other experiences’ into two separate questions – only 6% of personal statements for non-vocational subjects were used to assess applicants’ transferable skills. 

The Policy Note proposes two short questions focussing on:

  1. ‘motivation and academic potential’ (such as ‘Please describe one topic that is related to your course(s) and discuss what you have learnt about this topic’); and
  2. ‘other activities and experiences’ (such as ‘Please describe one other activity or experience and discuss what you have gained and how this is relevant to your course(s)’).

Tom Fryer, the lead author of the report, said:

The fact that four-in-ten UCAS personal statements are read for one minute or less underlines the importance of reform in this area. The UCAS personal statement is a stressful, ambiguous and lengthy process for many applicants, and this simply cannot be justified if the majority of statements are skimmed quickly by admissions staff.

Professor Steven Jones, the co-author of the report, said: 

We have long known that the UCAS personal statement provides an opportunity for some applicants to gain an advantage over their less privileged peers. While UCAS’s reform is welcome, this survey highlights that the proposals should focus on a limited number of short-response questions, to avoid imposing an unnecessary burden on applicants.

The Director of HEPI, Nick Hillman, said:

As this year’s exam round comes to an end, it is the right moment to look in detail at how university admissions staff make decisions.

One of the most poorly understood features of the higher education application process is the UCAS personal statement. This report shows personal statements are sometimes not read at all and, when they are, they are typically digested very quickly. Moreover, they are used more for some courses than others.

Shining a spotlight on the use of personal statements was always going to be useful to applicants and those who advise them, but doing it now helps inform the important reforms that UCAS are currently planning.

The HEPI Annual Conference is taking place in central London on Thursday, 22 June 2023 and will feature a range of high-profile speakers, plus the launch of the HEPI / Advance HE 2023 Student Academic Experience Survey. More details here.

Notes for Editors

  1. HEPI was established in 2002 to influence the higher education debate with evidence. We are UK-wide, independent and non-partisan. We are funded by organisations and higher education institutions that wish to support vibrant policy discussions, as well as through our own events. HEPI is a company limited by guarantee and a registered charity.
  2. Tom Fryer is a researcher at the Manchester Institute of Education at the University of Manchester, focussing on widening participation, inequalities and graduate outcomes from higher education in the UK. Professor Steven Jones is Head of the Manchester Institute of Education and is particularly interested in how the marketisation of English higher education impacts on staff and students. 
  3. Tom and Steven have published previous work on personal statements, including a HEPI Debate Paper and an initial response to UCAS’s proposed reforms. Steven has a range of previous research on personal statements, commissioned by the Sutton Trust, which can be found here and here, and he is also the author of Universities Under Fire: Hostile Discourses and Integrity Deficits in Higher Education (2022).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *