How should undergraduate degrees be funded? A collection of essays

HEPI Number:
173
Author:
Rose Stephenson
Published:

This collection of essays, edited by Rose Stephenson, Director of Policy and Advocacy at the Higher Education Policy Institute, delves into the challenges of financing higher education.

From Chloe Field’s critique of marketisation to Jo Johnson’s model of differentiated fees, the collection navigates several funding scenarios. London Economics provide an economic analysis of current and proposed models, grounding the debate with fiscal scrutiny. Analysis of polling from potential students considers how the different models may impact application rates.

This report is an essential read for educators, stakeholders and policymakers. It aims to stimulate debate on a reformed and sustainable approach to funding the minds of tomorrow.

Comments

Add comment

Your comment may be revised by the site if needed.

More like this

Treasury makes over £600 million surplus from 2022/23 Plan 2 student loans as NUS and HEPI publish an alternative student loan model. Key findings New research by London Economics has found that following various changes to student loan terms, implemented since early 2022, the Treasury…

Author
Dr Gavan Conlon, Maike Halterbeck, Jack Booth and Pietro Patrignani
Published
13 April 2026
Author
Dr Gavan Conlon, Maike Halterbeck, Jack Booth and Pietro Patrignani
Published
13 April 2026

Excessive risk-taking by higher education providers must be curtailed. With concerns mounting over the financial health of the English higher education sector, a new report from the Higher Education Policy…

Author
Tom Richmond
Published
9 April 2026